Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:15

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
NBA Finals’ 17 best players ranked for Thunder vs. Pacers series - SBNation.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Webb Captures a Cosmic Forest of Ancient Galaxies - PetaPixel
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Do you find Anushka Sen attractive?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are the pros and cons of banning homosexuality?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why does my mother care about my sister more than me?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
7 storylines to watch with All-Star voting underway - MLB.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Davante Adams feels rejuvenated: Joining Rams was "exactly what I needed" - NBC Sports